MTA and Biodentine have replaced older materials as the preferred agents for pulp therapy in both primary and permanent teeth. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of current technique recommendations for pulpotomies and pulp capping — with specific guidance on materials, hemostasis, isolation, and restoration timing.
1Primary Pulpotomy Using MTA or BiodentineStep-by-step technique recommendations for primary teeth
Isolation
Rubber Dam — Non-Negotiable
Rubber dam isolation is the gold standard and a non-negotiable standard of care. It prevents field contamination from blood, saliva, and bacteria throughout the procedure.
Coronal Pulp Removal
Manual or Rotary — No Significant Difference
The coronal pulp may be removed using a spoon excavator/curette, low-speed burs, or a combination. Studies show no significant difference in success rates between these methods.
Hemostasis & Irrigation
Control Bleeding Within 1–5 Minutes
Hemostasis can be achieved with a water/saline-moistened cotton pellet, saline irrigation, or a dry cotton pellet. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is highly recommended as an irrigant for its tissue-dissolving and antibacterial properties. Chlorhexidine is less preferred due to potential toxicity concerns.
Base Placement & Final Restoration
IRM or RMGIC Over the Bioceramic
Once MTA or Biodentine is placed over the exposure, cover it with a base of IRM or resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Both yield excellent results — 97% for IRM vs. 91% for RMGIC at 24 months.
Stainless Steel Crown — Strongly Recommended
While the restoration type does not directly alter MTA pulpotomy success, stainless steel crowns (SSC) are strongly recommended for durability and to provide a hermetic coronal seal. The final restoration can be placed on the same day.
2Pulp Capping in Primary TeethWhen to cap, when to pulpotomize, and when to leave dentin alone
Direct Pulp Capping (DPC)
Not Recommended for Carious Exposures
DPC is not recommended for carious pulp exposures in primary teeth. If a carious exposure occurs, a pulpotomy is the preferred and more predictable treatment.
Conditionally Recommended for Small Mechanical Exposures
DPC is appropriate only for small (≤ 1 mm) mechanical or traumatic exposures where the pulp is normal and bleeding is easily controlled. Use MTA over calcium hydroxide — MTA provides a thicker, more uniform dentin bridge and avoids the high rates of internal root resorption associated with calcium hydroxide.
Indirect Pulp Treatment (IPT)
Preferred Over DPC for Deep Carious Lesions
IPT — leaving the deepest layer of affected dentin intact to avoid exposure — is strongly recommended over DPC and complete caries removal for deep lesions. Biodentine showed a 99.24% success rate in one meta-analysis as an IPT liner.
For IPT, the type of medicament matters less than achieving a high-quality, leak-proof final coronal seal. Prioritize restoration quality above material selection.
3Pulp Capping in Permanent TeethTechnique specifics for achieving 80–90%+ success with MTA or Biodentine
Isolation
Rubber Dam Is a Critical Prognostic Factor
Adequate rubber dam isolation throughout the entire procedure is a critical prognostic factor. One meta-analysis found rubber dam usage increases the likelihood of a favorable DPC outcome by 44%.
Visualization & Hemostasis
Use Magnification
Using magnification (e.g., a microscope) to directly observe the exposure site is recommended. Verify that the pulp tissue is red, homogenous, and free of dentin chips before placing the capping material.
Achieve Hemostasis in Under 5 Minutes
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the preferred hemostatic agent for its combined hemostatic and antimicrobial benefits. Bleeding must be fully controlled before placing MTA or Biodentine.
Restoration
Place Final Restoration Immediately
Immediate placement of the final restoration over the DPC material is strongly advocated. Do not place a temporary filling and restore later — microleakage around a temporary can compromise the bioceramic before it sets and undermine the entire procedure.
Both MTA and Biodentine are significantly superior to calcium hydroxide in permanent teeth. Calcium hydroxide is prone to dissolving, poor sealing, and creating "tunnel defects" that allow bacterial microleakage over time. There is no statistically significant difference in success between MTA and Biodentine.

